Filtered view · see everything
The Court held that the National Trust for Historic Preservation lacks the concrete, particularized injury required for standing to challenge the White House East Wing project, granting a stay of the injunction.
The Court affirmed the government’s request for a stay, holding that the states cannot sue over the President’s election‑integrity executive order because they lack concrete injury and the claim is not ripe.
The Court ruled that federal district courts lack jurisdiction to review state‑court judgments even when those judgments are still subject to state appellate review, affirming a 5‑4 decision.
The Court held that the Second Circuit overstepped AEDPA's constraints by granting habeas relief based on Seibert, and it reversed the decision per curiam.
The Court held that the proper measure of just compensation after a tax foreclosure is the auction price, not the property's fair‑market value, and rejected an Eighth Amendment excessive‑fine claim.
The Court held that state prison employees cannot be sued in their personal capacities under RLUIPA unless they voluntarily consented to the statute's suit‑answering condition, affirming a 6‑3 majority. The decision hinges on the Spending Clause's consent requirement.
The Court ruled that the Helms‑Burton Act itself waives foreign sovereign immunity for Cuban agencies, allowing Exxon Mobil to sue without satisfying FSIA exceptions, in a 6‑3 decision.
The Court held that federal courts cannot create new causes of action under the Alien Tort Statute and that the Torture Victim Protection Act does not permit aiding‑and‑abetting claims, rejecting plaintiffs' claims against Cisco and its executives.
The Court held that the Immigration and Nationality Act does not require border officials to meet a clear‑and‑convincing evidence standard before deeming a lawful permanent resident seeking admission. The decision overturns a Second Circuit precedent and clarifies the statutory text.
The Court held that RLUIPA does not permit private lawsuits against individual correctional officers unless they have voluntarily consented to such liability, affirming a 6‑3 decision.
The Court held that the FTC's statutory requirement that commissioners be removable only for cause violates the Constitution's separation of powers, reaffirming the President's removal authority.
The Court rejected President Trump's request to stay a preliminary injunction protecting Fed Governor Lisa Cook, affirming statutory for‑cause removal protections and required procedural safeguards.
The Court held that schools may base women’s sports eligibility on biological sex, finding no Title IX or Fourteenth Amendment violation in statutes that bar biological males from female teams.
The Court held that the Fourteenth Amendment guarantees citizenship to anyone born in the United States, regardless of parents' immigration status, rejecting the Trump administration's executive order.
The Court held that the Fourteenth Amendment guarantees citizenship to all children born in the United States, regardless of parents' immigration status, rejecting the Trump administration's executive order.
The Court held that FECA's limits on political‑party coordinated spending violate the First Amendment, overturning Colorado Republican Federal Campaign Comm. v. Federal Election Comm. (Colorado II).
In Wolford v. Lopez, the Court held 6‑3 that Hawaii's law requiring property‑owner consent for concealed‑carry permit holders to bring firearms onto public‑open private land violates the Second and Fourteenth Amendments.
The Court held that 8 U.S.C. §1254a(b)(5)(A) bars courts from hearing non‑constitutional challenges to the termination of Temporary Protected Status, and it found the equal‑protection claim against Haiti's TPS termination unlikely to succeed.
In a 6-3 decision authored by Justice Alito, the Court interpreted the Immigration and Nationality Act's phrase "arrives in the United States" to require physical entry, rejecting the Ninth Circuit's broader reading and upholding the government’s metering policy.
The Court held that the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act bars a Missouri failure‑to‑warn lawsuit requiring Monsanto to add a cancer warning to Roundup labels, reversing the Missouri appellate court.
In Watson v. RNC, the Court ruled 5‑4 that federal election‑day statutes do not preempt Mississippi's law allowing absentee ballots postmarked by Election Day to be counted up to five days later, emphasizing the ordinary meaning of “election.”
The Court held that obtaining cell‑phone location history via a geofence warrant is a Fourth Amendment search, rejecting the third‑party doctrine and affirming privacy expectations in digital tracking data.