Proposed Extension of Mine Accident, Injury and Illness Reporting and Quarterly Employment/Coal Production Data Collection
More From This Agency
- Labor Department Reverses Jan. 7, 2026 OMB Control Number Revision for DOL‑Only Performance Accountability System July 27, 2026
- OSHA Susan Harwood Training Grant Quarterly Progress Report ICR Submitted for OMB Review July 27, 2026
- Labor Department Seeks Comments on Extending Escape and Evacuation Plans Information Collection July 25, 2026
- Proposed Extension of Hoist Operators' Physical Fitness Data Collection by MSHA July 25, 2026
- MSHA Seeks Comments on Extending Information Collection for Safety Defects, Examinations, Corrections, and Records July 25, 2026
Plain-English Summary
The notice announces that MSHA is proposing to continue collecting data on mine accidents, injuries, illnesses, quarterly employment, and coal production. The agency is requesting comments on the collection’s burden, format, and clarity. The extension is part of a pre‑clearance consultation required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The goal is to minimize reporting costs while ensuring necessary safety data are gathered.
Current Status
This is a proposed notice open for public comment on the information collection request.
What This Means
The abstract explains that DOL runs a pre‑clearance consultation to let the public and other agencies review proposed data collections before they are approved. In this case MSHA is asking for feedback on how the accident, injury, illness, employment, and production reports are designed, how long they take to complete, and what financial cost they impose on respondents. Commenters can suggest changes to the reporting format to make it easier to submit. The agency will use those suggestions to assess whether the collection meets the Paperwork Reduction Act’s goals of minimizing burden and ensuring clarity. The final collection will only be approved after this comment period and any necessary revisions.
Who Is Affected
Mine operators and contractors who must file the accident, injury, illness, employment, and coal‑production reports are directly impacted. State mining safety officials and the Mine Safety and Health Administration staff who process and analyze the data are also affected. The broader mining workforce may experience indirect effects if reporting requirements change the timing or detail of safety monitoring.
Background
The notice follows the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, which requires agencies to seek public input before imposing or extending information collections. MSHA is renewing an existing data collection that tracks workplace safety incidents and production metrics in the mining sector. The agency argues that up‑to‑date data are essential for monitoring compliance with mine‑safety regulations and for informing policy decisions. The extension is a routine step to keep the collection legally authorized and to address any identified burdens from previous cycles.
Arguments For
Proponents argue that continuing the collection provides critical, timely information needed to identify safety trends, allocate enforcement resources, and protect miners’ health. The pre‑clearance process helps ensure that the reporting forms are as streamlined as possible, reducing unnecessary paperwork while preserving essential data for oversight.
Arguments Against
The abstract does not highlight any controversy, and no specific objections are mentioned; therefore, there are no documented strong arguments against the extension.
Economic Considerations
Because the notice does not include an official cost estimate, any economic impact analysis must be tentative. Extending the collection will likely impose modest administrative costs on mining companies for preparing and submitting the reports, but the pre‑clearance comment period aims to limit those costs. If reporting formats are simplified, the financial burden could be reduced. Conversely, if additional data fields are added, some operators may incur higher compliance expenses. Overall, the impact is expected to be small relative to the broader economic activity of the mining industry.
Sections beyond the plain-English summary are AI-synthesized analysis based on the sourced Federal Register filing, read, edited where needed, and approved by a human editor before publication. Full methodology: Editorial & Methodology.
← All Records