VERIFIED · FEDERALREGISTER.GOV

FCC Proposes Substituting VHF Channel 10 for UHF Channel 20 for KENV-DT in Elko, Nevada

Proposed RuleFederal Communications CommissionAugust 15, 2026

By Christopher Smoot, Founder & Editor · Last verified against source: August 15, 2026

More From This Agency

Plain-English Summary

The Federal Communications Commission has issued a proposed rule to amend its Table of TV Allotments. It would replace the current allocation of UHF channel 20 with VHF channel 10 for the full‑service station KENV‑DT in Elko, Nevada. The change relies on the station’s existing licensed parameters and is intended to keep the station on the air. The proposal is open for public comment as part of the rulemaking process.

Current Status

Proposed rule open for public comment.

What This Means

The FCC is asking to formally move the channel assignment for KENV‑DT from UHF 20 to VHF 10 in its official allotment table. By using the same transmitter power, antenna height and coverage contour that KENV‑DT already operates under, the substitution should meet the principal community coverage requirements in Section 73.618(a). If approved, the station would no longer need to build a new UHF facility and could continue broadcasting on the VHF band. This change is intended to prevent the station from going dark while still meeting FCC technical standards. The amendment would become part of the permanent FCC rules once finalized.

Who Is Affected

KENV‑DT and its viewers in Elko, Nevada will be directly affected, as the station aims to stay on air without constructing a new UHF transmitter. The licensee, Reno (KENV‑TV) Licensee, Inc., will avoid the costs of building a new facility. Nearby broadcasters may need to review interference contours, though the proposal asserts compliance with existing rules. The broader public benefits from continued local television service.

Background

The proposal arises from a petition for rulemaking filed by the station’s licensee, who holds a construction permit for a UHF 20 facility but prefers to use its existing VHF parameters. The FCC’s Table of TV Allotments currently lists UHF 20 for Elko, creating a mismatch with the licensee’s operational plan. Federal law requires the FCC to maintain an up‑to‑date allotment table that reflects actual service. The licensee argues that substituting VHF 10 will satisfy community coverage requirements and avoid service loss. The FCC is evaluating the request under its standard technical and coverage rules.

Arguments For

The licensee contends that using VHF channel 10, with the same technical parameters as its current license, will allow KENV‑DT to remain operational and continue serving its local audience. The FCC’s staff notes that the substitution appears to meet the principal community coverage standards of Sec. 73.618(a), supporting the request’s technical feasibility.

Arguments Against

The abstract does not identify any organized opposition or significant controversy; thus, no substantial counterarguments are presented.

Economic Considerations

The FCC has not released an official cost‑benefit analysis for this specific substitution, so any economic impact assessment is speculative. If approved, the licensee would likely save on construction costs associated with building a new UHF facility, representing a cost avoidance rather than a direct expenditure. Viewers may experience no service disruption, preserving local advertising revenue streams. Potential minor costs could arise for nearby stations if interference studies or adjustments become necessary, but the proposal asserts compliance with existing technical rules. Overall, the net economic effect is expected to be modest and favorable to the licensee.

Sections beyond the plain-English summary are AI-synthesized analysis based on the sourced Federal Register filing, read, edited where needed, and approved by a human editor before publication. Full methodology: Editorial & Methodology.

← All Records