Greg Casar's Campaign Funding and Committee Role
Data as of August 15, 2026 · Refresh this data →
Biography and Office
Born 1989.
Congressional service:
- 2025–present · House of Representatives, TX-35 (119th Congress)
- 2023–2025 · House of Representatives, TX-35 (118th Congress)
Committee Assignments
Why this matters: committee seats are where legislative influence actually happens -- they are frequently the direct explanation for which industries and interest groups direct money toward a given member.
- House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform
- House Committee on Education and Workforce
- ↳ House Committee on Education and Workforce Subcommittee on Workforce Protections
- ↳ House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform Subcommittee on Delivering on Government Efficiency
- ↳ House Committee on Education and Workforce Subcommittee on Health, Employment, Labor, and Pensions
Timeline
- 2026-07-23 · Voted Yea on Roll Call 282 (Passed)
- 2026-07-23 · Voted Nay on Roll Call 283 (Passed)
- 2026-07-22 · Voted Nay on Roll Call 280 (Passed)
- 2026-07-22 · Voted No on Roll Call 274 (Failed)
- 2026-07-22 · Voted No on Roll Call 273 (Agreed to)
- 2026-07-22 · Voted Nay on Roll Call 278 (Passed)
- 2026-07-22 · Voted Yea on Roll Call 277 (Failed)
- 2026-07-22 · Voted Yea on Roll Call 279 (Failed)
- 2026-07-22 · Voted No on Roll Call 276 (Failed)
- 2026-07-22 · Voted Nay on Roll Call 281 (Passed)
- 2026-07-22 · Voted No on Roll Call 275 (Agreed to)
- 2026-07-21 · Voted No on Roll Call 262 (Failed)
- 2026-07-21 · Voted No on Roll Call 261 (Failed)
- 2026-07-21 · Voted No on Roll Call 260 (Agreed to)
- 2026-07-21 · Voted No on Roll Call 259 (Failed)
Who This Is
Rep. Greg Casar, a Democrat representing Texas’s 35th district, has served in the House since 2023. This profile details the sources of his campaign financing, separating direct organizational contributions from independent‑expenditure spending. Direct contributions total $371,595.38, while supporting independent expenditures add $753.59, for a combined estimated support of $372,348.97.
Top Organizational Funders (Current Cycle)
The largest direct donor is AISLE 518, a political committee, which contributed $10,000. Among labor‑related donors, Demand Justice PAC gave $5,000, and the Machinists Non‑Partisan Political League of the International Association of Machinists & Aerospace Workers contributed $5,000, representing the manufacturing and aerospace sector. The Carpenters Legislative Improvement Committee of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners also provided $5,000, reflecting the construction trades. The National Union of Healthcare Workers Federal Committee on Political Education contributed $5,000, indicating health‑care labor support. Independent‑expenditure groups were minimal; Community Change Voters spent $743.59 in total supporting Casar, and Sierra Club Independent Action added $10 in support.
Funding Pattern
Pattern observation: Casar’s top contributors are predominantly labor unions and progressive political committees, which aligns with his committee assignments. He serves on the House Committee on Education and Workforce, a panel that regularly oversees legislation affecting labor standards, apprenticeship programs, and workforce development—all areas of interest to the machinists, carpenters, healthcare, and communications workers unions that funded him. His role on the Oversight and Government Reform Committee does not directly intersect with the primary sectors of his donors, suggesting the donor profile is driven more by labor interests than by regulatory oversight concerns. Independent‑expenditure activity in support of Casar is modest, totaling less than $1,000, and no opposing expenditures were reported. No recorded votes on tracked bills are currently available, so a direct comparison between his voting record and donor preferences cannot be made at this time.
Contribution data sourced from FEC.gov public records. Campaign contributions to registered PACs are legal and regulated; this page reports facts without implying wrongdoing. The "Funding Pattern" section is AI-synthesized analysis, read, edited where needed, and approved by a human editor before publication. Full methodology: Editorial & Methodology.
Recent Voting Record
- On Motion to Recommit July 22, 2026YeaRoll call 279, Failed →
- On Passage July 22, 2026NayRoll call 278, Passed →
- On Motion to Recommit July 22, 2026YeaRoll call 277, Failed →
- On Agreeing to the Amendment July 22, 2026NoRoll call 276, Failed →
- On Agreeing to the Amendment July 22, 2026NoRoll call 275, Agreed to →
- On Agreeing to the Amendment July 22, 2026NoRoll call 274, Failed →
- On Agreeing to the Amendment July 22, 2026NoRoll call 273, Agreed to →
- On Passage July 21, 2026NayRoll call 272, Passed →
- On Passage July 21, 2026NayRoll call 271, Passed →
- On Motion to Recommit July 21, 2026YeaRoll call 270, Failed →
- On Agreeing to the Amendment July 21, 2026NoRoll call 269, Failed →
- On Agreeing to the Amendment July 21, 2026NoRoll call 268, Agreed to →
- On Agreeing to the Amendment July 21, 2026NoRoll call 267, Agreed to →
- On Agreeing to the Amendment July 21, 2026NoRoll call 266, Failed →
- On Agreeing to the Amendment July 21, 2026NoRoll call 265, Agreed to →
Source: U.S. House Clerk, Electronic Voting System. Showing most recent recorded votes.
← All Records