TOOMS INTELLIGENCE
SOURCE · FEC.GOV + CONGRESS.GOV PUBLIC RECORDS

Judy Chu's Campaign Funding and Committee Role

DEMU.S. HouseCA

By Christopher Smoot, Founder & Editor · Last verified against source: July 29, 2026

Data as of July 29, 2026 · Refresh this data →

Biography and Office

Born 1953.

Congressional service:

Committee Assignments

Why this matters: committee seats are where legislative influence actually happens -- they are frequently the direct explanation for which industries and interest groups direct money toward a given member.

Timeline

Who This Is

Rep. Judy Chu, a Democrat representing California's 28th district, has served in the U.S. House since 2009. She sits on the Ways and Means Committee and the Budget Committee. This profile details the $474,849.48 in direct organizational contributions, the $323.85 in supporting independent expenditures, and the combined total of $475,173.33. All figures reflect the current two‑year election cycle.

Top Organizational Funders (Current Cycle)

The largest direct contributors each gave $5,000: the International Union of Operating Engineers Local 12 (a construction union), American Crystal Sugar PAC (representing the sugar industry), the National Association of Enrolled Agents PAC (tax‑preparation professionals), Air Line Pilots Association International (airline pilots union), and PricewaterhouseCoopers PAC (accounting and consulting sector). Additional notable donors include the National Association of Realtors PAC, AICPA PAC, and Fidelity National Financial PAC, each also at $5,000. On the independent‑expenditure side, Courage California Super PAC spent multiple amounts totaling $225.24 in support, and GiveGreen United Action contributed $53.33 supporting Chu. No super‑PAC spending opposed her candidacy.

Funding Pattern

Pattern observation: Chu's direct funding comes from a mix of labor unions, industry trade groups, and professional associations whose policy interests fall under the jurisdiction of the Ways and Means Committee, which handles tax, trade, and social‑security matters. For example, the sugar PAC and the accounting PAC may have stakes in tax legislation overseen by Ways and Means. The airline pilots union and the construction union also intersect with labor provisions that the Budget Committee reviews. Independent‑expenditure activity is minimal, with only $323.85 in supporting spending and none opposing, indicating limited outside‑group amplification. No recent votes are linked to tracked bills, so a direct vote‑to‑donor alignment cannot be demonstrated. Overall, the contribution pattern reflects typical sectoral interests in tax and labor policy rather than any singular dominant influence.

Contribution data sourced from FEC.gov public records. Campaign contributions to registered PACs are legal and regulated; this page reports facts without implying wrongdoing. The "Funding Pattern" section is AI-synthesized analysis, read, edited where needed, and approved by a human editor before publication. Full methodology: Editorial & Methodology.

Recent Voting Record

Source: U.S. House Clerk, Electronic Voting System. Showing most recent recorded votes.

← All Records