Daniel Crenshaw's Campaign Funding and Committee Role
Data as of August 31, 2026 · Refresh this data →
Biography and Office
Born 1984.
Congressional service:
- 2025–present · House of Representatives, TX-02 (119th Congress)
- 2023–2025 · House of Representatives, TX-02 (118th Congress)
- 2021–2023 · House of Representatives, TX-02 (117th Congress)
- 2019–2021 · House of Representatives, TX-02 (116th Congress)
Committee Assignments
Why this matters: committee seats are where legislative influence actually happens -- they are frequently the direct explanation for which industries and interest groups direct money toward a given member.
- House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence
- House Committee on Energy and Commerce
- ↳ House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence Subcommittee on Defense Intelligence and Overhead Architecture (Chairman)
- ↳ House Committee on Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations
- ↳ House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence Subcommittee on Central Intelligence Agency
- ↳ House Committee on Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on Health
Timeline
- 2026-07-23 · Voted Yea on Roll Call 283 (Passed)
- 2026-07-23 · Voted Nay on Roll Call 282 (Passed)
- 2026-07-22 · Voted Yea on Roll Call 281 (Passed)
- 2026-07-22 · Voted Nay on Roll Call 277 (Failed)
- 2026-07-22 · Voted No on Roll Call 276 (Failed)
- 2026-07-22 · Voted Yea on Roll Call 280 (Passed)
- 2026-07-22 · Voted Yea on Roll Call 278 (Passed)
- 2026-07-22 · Voted Not Voting on Roll Call 275 (Agreed to)
- 2026-07-22 · Voted Aye on Roll Call 274 (Failed)
- 2026-07-22 · Voted Nay on Roll Call 279 (Failed)
- 2026-07-22 · Voted Aye on Roll Call 273 (Agreed to)
- 2026-07-21 · Voted Aye on Roll Call 261 (Failed)
- 2026-07-21 · Voted Aye on Roll Call 260 (Agreed to)
- 2026-07-21 · Voted No on Roll Call 259 (Failed)
- 2026-07-21 · Voted No on Roll Call 258 (Agreed to)
Who This Is
Daniel Crenshaw is a Republican representing Texas’s 2nd congressional district in the U.S. House since 2019. This profile details the money he has received directly from organizations and PACs, the modest independent‑expenditure spending that has supported him, and the combined total of $851,043.53. Direct contributions amount to $849,663.42, while supporting super‑PAC activity adds $1,380.11 and there were no opposing independent expenditures. The page also notes his assignments to the Intelligence and Energy & Commerce committees.
Top Organizational Funders (Current Cycle)
The largest single donor is the political group 1776 Patriots United, which contributed a combined $225,206.43 across several filings. The Lukens Company, a manufacturing firm, gave $60,921.19, making it the second‑largest contributor. Hospitality‑sector donor Hotel Del Coronado contributed $10,974.39. Pro‑Israel advocacy PAC of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee donated $5,275.25. Energy giant ExxonMobil’s corporate PAC contributed $5,000, linking to the Energy and Commerce committee. On the independent‑expenditure side, the National Rifle Association Political Victory Fund spent $1,029.29 in support, while no groups funded opposing ads.
Funding Pattern
As chairman of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence’s Subcommittee on Defense Intelligence and Overhead Architecture, Crenshaw’s receipt of contributions from defense‑related entities such as the Employees of Northrop Grumman Corporation PAC ($5,000) aligns with his oversight responsibilities. His seat on the Energy and Commerce Committee coincides with a $5,000 donation from ExxonMobil PAC, reflecting a direct connection to the energy sector’s legislative jurisdiction. The dominant support from 1776 Patriots United, a conservative advocacy group, underscores a broad grassroots backing that is typical for a Republican from Texas. Contributions from the Lukens Company and Hotel Del Coronado suggest support from manufacturing and hospitality interests, though these sectors fall outside his primary committee purviews. Independent‑expenditure activity is minimal, with only $1,380 in supporting ads and none opposing, indicating limited super‑PAC involvement in his race. No recorded votes on tracked bills are currently available, so a direct vote‑to‑donor alignment cannot be assessed at this time. Overall, the funding pattern shows a mix of ideological groups, sector‑specific corporate PACs linked to his committee work, and modest outside‑group spending.
Contribution data sourced from FEC.gov public records. Campaign contributions to registered PACs are legal and regulated; this page reports facts without implying wrongdoing. The "Funding Pattern" section is AI-synthesized analysis, read, edited where needed, and approved by a human editor before publication. Full methodology: Editorial & Methodology.
Recent Voting Record
- On Motion to Recommit July 22, 2026NayRoll call 279, Failed →
- On Passage July 22, 2026YeaRoll call 278, Passed →
- On Motion to Recommit July 22, 2026NayRoll call 277, Failed →
- On Agreeing to the Amendment July 22, 2026NoRoll call 276, Failed →
- On Agreeing to the Amendment July 22, 2026Not VotingRoll call 275, Agreed to →
- On Agreeing to the Amendment July 22, 2026AyeRoll call 274, Failed →
- On Agreeing to the Amendment July 22, 2026AyeRoll call 273, Agreed to →
- On Passage July 21, 2026YeaRoll call 272, Passed →
- On Passage July 21, 2026YeaRoll call 271, Passed →
- On Motion to Recommit July 21, 2026NayRoll call 270, Failed →
- On Agreeing to the Amendment July 21, 2026AyeRoll call 269, Failed →
- On Agreeing to the Amendment July 21, 2026AyeRoll call 268, Agreed to →
- On Agreeing to the Amendment July 21, 2026AyeRoll call 267, Agreed to →
- On Agreeing to the Amendment July 21, 2026AyeRoll call 266, Failed →
- On Agreeing to the Amendment July 21, 2026AyeRoll call 265, Agreed to →
Source: U.S. House Clerk, Electronic Voting System. Showing most recent recorded votes.
← All Records