TOOMS INTELLIGENCE
SOURCE · FEC.GOV + CONGRESS.GOV PUBLIC RECORDS

Zoe Lofgren's Campaign Funding and Committee Role

DEMU.S. HouseCA

By Christopher Smoot, Founder & Editor · Last verified against source: July 27, 2026

Data as of July 27, 2026 · Refresh this data →

Biography and Office

Born 1947.

Congressional service:

Committee Assignments

Why this matters: committee seats are where legislative influence actually happens -- they are frequently the direct explanation for which industries and interest groups direct money toward a given member.

Timeline

Who This Is

Rep. Zoe Lofgren, a Democrat representing California's 18th district, has served in the U.S. House since 1995. This profile details her direct campaign contributions, the independent expenditures that have supported her, and the combined financial support. Direct contributions to her campaign total $524,230.56, while supporting independent expenditures amount to $200,746.20, giving a combined support of $724,976.76. No independent expenditures have been reported opposing her.

Top Organizational Funders (Current Cycle)

The largest direct contributor is the "ZOE 2024" campaign committee with $63,991.15, followed by the law firm Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP with $18,241.76. Additional sizable gifts from the same "ZOE 2024" committee amount to $7,107.70, $7,106.67, and $6,560.51. The "Lofgren Victory Fund - Unitemized" contributed $5,983.47. Tech‑sector PACs also appear, with Amazon Corporate LLC Separate Segregated Fund (Amazon PAC) and Microsoft Corporation Stakeholders Voluntary PAC each giving $5,000. Independent expenditures are dominated by Central Coast Values PAC, which spent roughly $175,000 in support, and Resolute Courage PAC, which contributed about $23,000 supporting Lofgren.

Funding Pattern

Pattern observation: Lofgren’s role as Ranking Member of the Science, Space, and Technology Committee aligns with significant contributions from major technology companies such as Amazon and Microsoft, whose PACs each gave $5,000. These donors have a direct interest in federal science and technology policy, which falls under the committee’s jurisdiction. The substantial legal‑service contribution from Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP, a firm known for immigration and corporate law, may reflect interest in the Judiciary Committee’s oversight of legal matters. Labor and agricultural donors, including the Machinists Non‑Partisan Political League, Western Growers PAC, and American Crystal Sugar PAC, also appear in the top‑ten list, though the Science Committee’s portfolio does not directly oversee these sectors. No independent expenditure groups have reported spending against Lofgren, indicating a lack of organized opposition in the current cycle. The absence of recorded votes on tracked legislation prevents a direct correlation between specific votes and donor interests at this time. Overall, the funding profile shows strong support from tech‑related PACs and alignment with her committee assignments, while the diverse mix of donors suggests broader constituency outreach. The combined financial support of nearly $725,000 underscores the substantial resources mobilized for her 2024 campaign.

Contribution data sourced from FEC.gov public records. Campaign contributions to registered PACs are legal and regulated; this page reports facts without implying wrongdoing. The "Funding Pattern" section is AI-synthesized analysis, read, edited where needed, and approved by a human editor before publication. Full methodology: Editorial & Methodology.

Recent Voting Record

Source: U.S. House Clerk, Electronic Voting System. Showing most recent recorded votes.

← All Records