SOURCE · FEC.GOV + CONGRESS.GOV PUBLIC RECORDS

Brian Mast's Campaign Funding and Committee Role

REPU.S. HouseFL

By Christopher Smoot, Founder & Editor · Last verified against source: August 19, 2026

Data as of August 19, 2026 · Refresh this data →

Biography and Office

Born 1980.

Congressional service:

Committee Assignments

Why this matters: committee seats are where legislative influence actually happens -- they are frequently the direct explanation for which industries and interest groups direct money toward a given member.

Timeline

Who This Is

Brian Mast has served as the U.S. Representative for Florida's 21st congressional district since 2017. He chairs the House Committee on Foreign Affairs and also serves on the Transportation and Infrastructure Committee. This page details his campaign financing, separating direct contributions from independent expenditures, and reports a combined total of $901,975.88. No recorded votes on tracked bills are currently linked to him.

Top Organizational Funders (Current Cycle)

Direct contributions are dominated by the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) PAC, which gave $58,850, $55,900, $46,800, $42,000 and $34,400, together accounting for the bulk of the $848,044.59 received. The next largest direct donor is NorPAC, contributing $31,980. All these donors are political action committees representing pro‑Israel advocacy and business interests. Independent expenditure activity was modest, with the American Veterans Initiative PAC spending $2,020.74 and $1,636.23 in support of Mast, and the American Veterans Support Group PAC adding $1,291.26, for a total of roughly $5,000. No independent groups funded opposition.

Funding Pattern

The concentration of AIPAC PAC contributions aligns with Mast’s role as Chair of the Foreign Affairs Committee, which oversees U.S. policy toward Israel and the Middle East. While the Transportation and Infrastructure Committee does not directly intersect with the pro‑Israel agenda, the committee’s jurisdiction over overseas infrastructure projects could be of ancillary interest to donors focused on foreign policy. NorPAC’s support reflects a broader business‑friendly orientation, though no specific transportation‑related legislation has been highlighted in Mast’s record. Independent expenditures in favor of Mast were limited to veteran‑focused PACs, suggesting additional support from constituencies concerned with defense and veterans' issues. No super‑PACs spent money to oppose Mast, and overall independent spending was under $6,000, indicating minimal outside pressure. Because no votes on tracked bills are currently linked to Mast, there is no direct legislative evidence to assess alignment with donor interests. The funding pattern therefore shows a strong linkage between foreign‑policy donors and his committee leadership, without evident contradictions in his public voting record.

Contribution data sourced from FEC.gov public records. Campaign contributions to registered PACs are legal and regulated; this page reports facts without implying wrongdoing. The "Funding Pattern" section is AI-synthesized analysis, read, edited where needed, and approved by a human editor before publication. Full methodology: Editorial & Methodology.

Recent Voting Record

Source: U.S. House Clerk, Electronic Voting System. Showing most recent recorded votes.

Further Reading

Independent news coverage, not a primary source. FEC and Congress.gov records above remain the sourced facts on this page.

← All Records