TOOMS INTELLIGENCE
SOURCE · FEC.GOV + CONGRESS.GOV PUBLIC RECORDS

Dave Min's Campaign Funding and Committee Role

DEMU.S. HouseCA

By Christopher Smoot, Founder & Editor · Last verified against source: August 16, 2026

Data as of August 16, 2026 · Refresh this data →

Biography and Office

Born 1976.

Congressional service:

Committee Assignments

Why this matters: committee seats are where legislative influence actually happens -- they are frequently the direct explanation for which industries and interest groups direct money toward a given member.

Timeline

Who This Is

Rep. Dave Min, a Democrat representing California’s 47th House district, has served since 2025. This profile separates his $795,944.39 in direct organizational contributions from the $4,314,145.18 in supporting independent expenditures, totaling $5,110,089.57 in estimated support. It also lists the major donors and outlines his committee assignments. No votes on tracked bills are currently recorded.

Top Organizational Funders (Current Cycle)

The largest direct contributor is the Jeffries Battleground Protection Fund, which gave $34,900, followed by the Southern California Victory Fund with $22,400 and the Frontline Protection Fund contributing $16,750. Also notable are the Clark Frontline Victory Fund ($16,300) and Democracy Summer 2026 ($15,000), both political‑advocacy PACs. On the independent‑expenditure side, the United Democracy Project spent $1,730,000 opposing Min, making it the top Super PAC against him. Club for Growth Action also opposed him, spending $623,108.83, while the Everytown for Gun Safety Victory Fund supported him with $549,477. Direct contributions and independent expenditures are reported separately, with contributions totaling just under $0.8 million and outside spending exceeding $5 million.

Funding Pattern

Pattern observation: Min’s top direct donors are issue‑focused PACs rather than industry‑specific groups, and none align directly with the jurisdictions of his committee assignments. His service on the Natural Resources Committee does not correspond to any major donor from the energy sector. Similarly, the Joint Economic Committee and the Oversight and Government Reform Committee have no evident ties to the listed contributors, which are primarily political advocacy organizations. The most significant outside spending comes from the United Democracy Project, which has poured over $1.7 million in ads opposing Min, suggesting a concerted effort by that group to influence his race. Club for Growth Action, a conservative economic advocacy group, also opposed him, reflecting broader partisan opposition rather than a specific policy dispute. The supporting independent expenditure from Everytown for Gun Safety Victory Fund indicates some aligned interest in gun‑safety issues. With no recorded votes on tracked legislation, it is not possible to assess how Min’s voting behavior aligns with any donor’s preferences at this time. Overall, the funding profile shows a higher volume of opposition spending than support, while direct contributions remain modest and sector‑neutral.

Contribution data sourced from FEC.gov public records. Campaign contributions to registered PACs are legal and regulated; this page reports facts without implying wrongdoing. The "Funding Pattern" section is AI-synthesized analysis, read, edited where needed, and approved by a human editor before publication. Full methodology: Editorial & Methodology.

Recent Voting Record

Source: U.S. House Clerk, Electronic Voting System. Showing most recent recorded votes.

← All Records