TOOMS INTELLIGENCE
SOURCE · FEC.GOV + CONGRESS.GOV PUBLIC RECORDS

Jimmy Panetta's Campaign Funding and Committee Role

DEMU.S. HouseCA

By Christopher Smoot, Founder & Editor · Last verified against source: August 17, 2026

Data as of August 17, 2026 · Refresh this data →

Biography and Office

Born 1969.

Congressional service:

Committee Assignments

Why this matters: committee seats are where legislative influence actually happens -- they are frequently the direct explanation for which industries and interest groups direct money toward a given member.

Timeline

Who This Is

Rep. Jimmy Panetta, a Democrat representing California’s 19th congressional district, has served in the U.S. House since 2017. This profile details the sources of his campaign financing for the current two‑year cycle, separating direct contributions from independent expenditures. Direct contributions from organizations and PACs total $853,404.83, while supporting independent expenditures add $18,226.54, for a combined estimated support of $871,631.37. No independent expenditures have been reported opposing his candidacy.

Top Organizational Funders (Current Cycle)

The largest direct donor is the law‑firm Janney Montgomery Scott LLC, which contributed three separate amounts totaling $18,824.68. The National Multifamily Housing Council Political Action Committee gave $5,000, reflecting the multifamily real‑estate sector. The National Beer Wholesalers Association PAC contributed $5,000, representing the alcoholic‑beverage distribution industry. The National Association of Letter Carriers Political Fund and the Machinists Non‑Partisan Political League each provided $5,000, indicating support from postal‑worker and machinist labor unions. On the independent‑expenditure side, With Honor Fund II, Inc. spent $13,987.65 supporting Panetta, and the Monterey County Democratic Central Committee spent $1,458.33 in support; no groups reported spending to oppose him.

Funding Pattern

Pattern observation: Panetta’s placement on the House Ways and Means Committee aligns with several top donors from sectors that benefit from tax and trade policy, such as the multifamily housing industry and the beer‑wholesaling trade association. Contributions from Janney Montgomery Scott LLC, a corporate law firm, may be linked to the committee’s jurisdiction over corporate tax legislation. Labor‑union donors such as the Letter Carriers Political Fund and the Machinists league are typical supporters of members serving on budget‑related committees, where spending priorities are set. The modest level of supportive independent expenditures ($18,226.54) and the absence of any opposing spending suggest limited outside‑group contestation in this cycle. No votes on tracked legislation have been recorded for Panetta, so a direct vote‑to‑donor alignment cannot be demonstrated at this time. Overall, the financing profile shows a concentration of contributions from legal services, real‑estate, beverage distribution and labor‑union groups, all of which have policy interests that intersect with the jurisdiction of the Ways and Means and Budget committees.

Contribution data sourced from FEC.gov public records. Campaign contributions to registered PACs are legal and regulated; this page reports facts without implying wrongdoing. The "Funding Pattern" section is AI-synthesized analysis, read, edited where needed, and approved by a human editor before publication. Full methodology: Editorial & Methodology.

Recent Voting Record

Source: U.S. House Clerk, Electronic Voting System. Showing most recent recorded votes.

← All Records