Luz Rivas's Campaign Funding and Committee Role
Data as of August 16, 2026 · Refresh this data →
Biography and Office
Born 1974.
Congressional service:
- 2025–present · House of Representatives, CA-29 (119th Congress)
Committee Assignments
Why this matters: committee seats are where legislative influence actually happens -- they are frequently the direct explanation for which industries and interest groups direct money toward a given member.
- House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology
- House Committee on Natural Resources
- ↳ House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology Subcommittee on Investigations and Oversight
- ↳ House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology Subcommittee on Research and Technology
- ↳ House Committee on Natural Resources Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Resources
- ↳ House Committee on Natural Resources Subcommittee on Water, Wildlife and Fisheries
Timeline
- 2026-07-23 · Voted Yea on Roll Call 282 (Passed)
- 2026-07-23 · Voted Nay on Roll Call 283 (Passed)
- 2026-07-22 · Voted No on Roll Call 274 (Failed)
- 2026-07-22 · Voted No on Roll Call 273 (Agreed to)
- 2026-07-22 · Voted Yea on Roll Call 279 (Failed)
- 2026-07-22 · Voted Nay on Roll Call 280 (Passed)
- 2026-07-22 · Voted Nay on Roll Call 281 (Passed)
- 2026-07-22 · Voted Yea on Roll Call 277 (Failed)
- 2026-07-22 · Voted Nay on Roll Call 278 (Passed)
- 2026-07-22 · Voted No on Roll Call 276 (Failed)
- 2026-07-22 · Voted No on Roll Call 275 (Agreed to)
- 2026-07-21 · Voted No on Roll Call 261 (Failed)
- 2026-07-21 · Voted No on Roll Call 260 (Agreed to)
- 2026-07-21 · Voted No on Roll Call 259 (Failed)
- 2026-07-21 · Voted Aye on Roll Call 258 (Agreed to)
Who This Is
Luz Rivas, a Democrat representing California’s 29th House district, has been in office since 2025. This profile details the $503,900.01 in direct organizational/PAC contributions she received, the $70,802.02 in supporting independent expenditures, and the combined $574,702.03 total. It also lists her committee assignments on Science, Space, and Technology and Natural Resources.
Top Organizational Funders (Current Cycle)
The largest direct contributors each gave $5,000, with Medicare for All, a health‑care advocacy group, leading the list. The American Crystal Sugar Company Political Action Committee contributed $5,000, representing the food‑agriculture sector. The Machinists Non‑Partisan Political League of the International Association of Machinists & Aerospace Workers also gave $5,000, reflecting a labor‑union interest. The National Association of Letter Carriers Political Fund contributed $5,000, another labor‑union source. Charter Communications Inc. Political Action Committee added $5,000, indicating telecom industry support. On the independent‑expenditure side, the Cooperative of American Physicians Independent Expenditure Committee spent a combined $50,244.10 supporting Rivas, and Nuestro PAC contributed $20,000 in support; no groups funded opposition.
Funding Pattern
Pattern observation: Rivas’s committee work on Science, Space, and Technology aligns with the substantial backing from the Cooperative of American Physicians IEC, a health‑focused outside group. While the Physicians IEC’s support could reflect interest in science‑related health research policy, her direct labor‑union donors such as the Machinists League and Letter Carriers Fund may find common ground in workplace and safety regulations overseen by the Natural Resources Committee. The presence of a sugar‑industry PAC and a telecom PAC among top contributors does not map directly onto her committee jurisdictions, suggesting broader coalition building rather than sector‑specific targeting. Independent‑expenditure activity is modest and entirely supportive, with no recorded opposition spending. No tracked votes are currently linked to Rivas, so the record does not yet show a measurable alignment or divergence with any donor’s policy preferences. Overall, the funding mix shows a balance of health advocacy, labor, and industry contributions, with a notable emphasis on health‑related outside spending that corresponds to her Science Committee role.
Contribution data sourced from FEC.gov public records. Campaign contributions to registered PACs are legal and regulated; this page reports facts without implying wrongdoing. The "Funding Pattern" section is AI-synthesized analysis, read, edited where needed, and approved by a human editor before publication. Full methodology: Editorial & Methodology.
Recent Voting Record
- On Motion to Recommit July 22, 2026YeaRoll call 279, Failed →
- On Passage July 22, 2026NayRoll call 278, Passed →
- On Motion to Recommit July 22, 2026YeaRoll call 277, Failed →
- On Agreeing to the Amendment July 22, 2026NoRoll call 276, Failed →
- On Agreeing to the Amendment July 22, 2026NoRoll call 275, Agreed to →
- On Agreeing to the Amendment July 22, 2026NoRoll call 274, Failed →
- On Agreeing to the Amendment July 22, 2026NoRoll call 273, Agreed to →
- On Passage July 21, 2026NayRoll call 272, Passed →
- On Passage July 21, 2026NayRoll call 271, Passed →
- On Motion to Recommit July 21, 2026YeaRoll call 270, Failed →
- On Agreeing to the Amendment July 21, 2026NoRoll call 269, Failed →
- On Agreeing to the Amendment July 21, 2026NoRoll call 268, Agreed to →
- On Agreeing to the Amendment July 21, 2026NoRoll call 267, Agreed to →
- On Agreeing to the Amendment July 21, 2026NoRoll call 266, Failed →
- On Agreeing to the Amendment July 21, 2026NoRoll call 265, Agreed to →
Source: U.S. House Clerk, Electronic Voting System. Showing most recent recorded votes.
← All Records