TOOMS INTELLIGENCE
SOURCE · FEC.GOV + CONGRESS.GOV PUBLIC RECORDS

Linda Sanchez's Campaign Funding and Committee Role

DEMU.S. HouseCA

By Christopher Smoot, Founder & Editor · Last verified against source: August 11, 2026

Data as of August 11, 2026 · Refresh this data →

Biography and Office

Born 1969.

Congressional service:

Committee Assignments

Why this matters: committee seats are where legislative influence actually happens -- they are frequently the direct explanation for which industries and interest groups direct money toward a given member.

Timeline

Who This Is

Rep. Linda Sanchez, a Democrat representing California's 38th district, has served in the U.S. House since 2003. This profile details her campaign finance picture, separating direct organizational contributions from outside independent expenditures. Direct PAC and committee‑level donations total $800,525, while supporting super‑PAC spending adds $461, for a combined $800,986. Sanchez sits on the House Ways and Means Committee, the chamber’s chief tax and entitlement policy body.

Top Organizational Funders (Current Cycle)

The largest direct contributors each gave $5,000, with the top five being Amgen Inc. Political Action Committee (pharmaceutical), the Carpenters Legislative Improvement Committee of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners (construction union), the Engineers Political Education Committee/International Union of Operating Engineers (skilled‑trade union), KPMG Partners/Principals and Employees PAC (accounting and professional services), and Humana Inc. Political Action Committee (health insurance). Additional notable donors at the $5,000 level include the No Vote Left Behind PAC, TIAA PAC, CHC Bold PAC, Elevance Health PAC, and AICPA PAC, reflecting a mix of health‑care, financial‑services, and professional‑association interests. Independent expenditure activity is modest; the Courage California Super PAC contributed a total of $166.45 in support, while the Planned Parenthood Advocacy Project Los Angeles County Action Fund contributed $176.50 supporting Sanchez. No super‑PACs filed expenditures opposing her.

Funding Pattern

Pattern observation: Sanchez’s placement on the Ways and Means Committee places her at the legislative hub for Medicare, Medicaid, and overall health‑care financing, which aligns with the sizable contributions from health‑care entities such as Humana, Elevance Health, and Amgen. The committee’s jurisdiction over tax policy also dovetails with contributions from accounting and financial‑services PACs like KPMG and the AICPA, suggesting an interest in fiscal matters that affect those sectors. Union donors representing construction and engineering trades, such as the Carpenters and Engineers committees, may be seeking influence on the committee’s role in infrastructure‑related tax provisions. Independent expenditure spending in favor of Sanchez is minimal, with only $166.45 from Courage California and $176.50 from a Planned Parenthood group, indicating limited outside spending pressure. No opposing super‑PAC activity was recorded, underscoring the low level of adversarial outside financing. Because no recent tracked votes are linked to Sanchez, the profile cannot point to a specific vote that aligns or conflicts with any top donor’s policy interests. Overall, the funding mix reflects a blend of health‑care, professional‑services, and labor interests that correspond to the policy domains overseen by Ways and Means.

Contribution data sourced from FEC.gov public records. Campaign contributions to registered PACs are legal and regulated; this page reports facts without implying wrongdoing. The "Funding Pattern" section is AI-synthesized analysis, read, edited where needed, and approved by a human editor before publication. Full methodology: Editorial & Methodology.

Recent Voting Record

Source: U.S. House Clerk, Electronic Voting System. Showing most recent recorded votes.

← All Records