TOOMS INTELLIGENCE
SOURCE · FEC.GOV + CONGRESS.GOV PUBLIC RECORDS

Elise M. Stefanik's Campaign Funding and Committee Role

REPU.S. HouseNY

By Christopher Smoot, Founder & Editor · Last verified against source: August 30, 2026

Data as of August 30, 2026 · Refresh this data →

Biography and Office

Born 1984.

Congressional service:

Committee Assignments

Why this matters: committee seats are where legislative influence actually happens -- they are frequently the direct explanation for which industries and interest groups direct money toward a given member.

Timeline

Who This Is

Rep. Elise M. Stefanik, a Republican representing New York’s 21st District, has served in the U.S. House since 2015. This profile details her campaign finance picture, separating direct organizational contributions ($3,576,331.46) from independent‑expenditure support ($681.37) and presenting the combined total of $3,577,012.83. It also lists her current committee assignments on Intelligence, Education and Workforce, and Armed Services. The page provides a concise analysis of funding sources and any observable patterns.

Top Organizational Funders (Current Cycle)

The leading direct contributor is the Elise Victory Fund, which provided a series of donations that total roughly $1,092,153, making it by far the largest source of cash for the campaign. The next biggest source is the House GOP Battleground Fund, contributing about $274,825 across three entries. No other individual organization surpassed the $100,000 mark. On the independent‑expenditure side, the Hunter Action Fund (HAF) spent $681.37 in support of Stefanik, with no recorded spending against her. Both the Elise Victory Fund and the House GOP Battleground Fund are partisan or personal‑campaign vehicles rather than industry‑specific PACs, so no clear sector affiliation can be drawn from them.

Funding Pattern

Funding pattern observation: the bulk of Stefanik’s direct money comes from personal‑campaign and party‑aligned funds rather than corporate or trade‑group PACs, which limits the ability to link donors to her committee jurisdictions. Her assignments on the Intelligence and Armed Services committees do not correspond to any identifiable defense‑industry donor in the disclosed top‑five list. The Education and Workforce committee likewise lacks a direct tie to the listed contributors. Independent‑expenditure activity is minimal, with only a modest supportive spend by a single Super PAC and zero opposing spend. No independent expenditures were reported against her, underscoring the limited outside‑group pressure in this cycle. Because no votes are currently linked to tracked bills, there is no legislative vote to compare against donor interests. Overall, the financing profile reflects a reliance on party‑aligned fundraising rather than sector‑specific patronage.

Contribution data sourced from FEC.gov public records. Campaign contributions to registered PACs are legal and regulated; this page reports facts without implying wrongdoing. The "Funding Pattern" section is AI-synthesized analysis, read, edited where needed, and approved by a human editor before publication. Full methodology: Editorial & Methodology.

Recent Voting Record

Source: U.S. House Clerk, Electronic Voting System. Showing most recent recorded votes.

← All Records