TOOMS INTELLIGENCE
SOURCE · FEC.GOV + CONGRESS.GOV PUBLIC RECORDS

Greg Steube's Campaign Funding and Committee Role

REPU.S. HouseFL

By Christopher Smoot, Founder & Editor · Last verified against source: August 24, 2026

Data as of August 24, 2026 · Refresh this data →

Biography and Office

Born 1978.

Congressional service:

Committee Assignments

Why this matters: committee seats are where legislative influence actually happens -- they are frequently the direct explanation for which industries and interest groups direct money toward a given member.

Timeline

Who This Is

Greg Steube, a Republican representing Florida's 17th House district, has served in the U.S. House since 2019. This profile details the sources of his campaign financing, separating direct organizational and PAC contributions from independent expenditures, and notes the combined total of $548,460.46. Steube sits on the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence and the House Committee on Ways and Means. No independent‑expenditure groups filed supporting or opposing ads in the current cycle.

Top Organizational Funders (Current Cycle)

The largest direct contribution came from the Tampa Bay America First Coalition, which gave $6,160.46. Health‑insurance interests are represented by Guidewell Mutual Holding Corporation PAC, which contributed three separate $5,000 donations for a combined $15,000. Gridiron‑PAC, a sports‑related political action committee, added $5,000. The hospitality sector is reflected in a $5,000 gift from the American Hotel and Lodging Association PAC ("HotelPAC"). Agricultural interests appear via a $5,000 donation from the United States Sugar Corporation Employee Stock Ownership Plan Political Action Committee.

Funding Pattern

Pattern observation: Steube's placement on the Ways and Means Committee aligns with the policy domains of several top donors, including health‑insurance, hospitality, and agricultural sectors. Guidewell PAC's contributions relate to health‑care financing, a core jurisdiction of Ways and Means, suggesting a natural interest in legislation affecting insurers. The United States Sugar PAC’s support corresponds with agricultural tax provisions also overseen by Ways and Means. The hospitality‑focused HotelPAC donor may be attentive to tax deductions and travel‑related provisions handled by Ways and Means. No independent‑expenditure groups filed ads for or against Steube in this cycle, indicating a lack of outside‑group spending pressure. Recorded votes on tracked bills are not currently linked to Steube, so direct vote‑funding correlations cannot be assessed. Overall, the funding pattern shows modest contributions from sector‑specific PACs rather than large‑scale corporate or labor donors.

Contribution data sourced from FEC.gov public records. Campaign contributions to registered PACs are legal and regulated; this page reports facts without implying wrongdoing. The "Funding Pattern" section is AI-synthesized analysis, read, edited where needed, and approved by a human editor before publication. Full methodology: Editorial & Methodology.

Recent Voting Record

Source: U.S. House Clerk, Electronic Voting System. Showing most recent recorded votes.

← All Records