TOOMS INTELLIGENCE
SOURCE · FEC.GOV + CONGRESS.GOV PUBLIC RECORDS

David Taylor's Campaign Funding and Committee Role

REPU.S. HouseOH

By Christopher Smoot, Founder & Editor · Last verified against source: July 27, 2026

Data as of July 27, 2026 · Refresh this data →

Biography and Office

Born 1969.

Congressional service:

Committee Assignments

Why this matters: committee seats are where legislative influence actually happens -- they are frequently the direct explanation for which industries and interest groups direct money toward a given member.

Timeline

Who This Is

Rep. David Taylor, a Republican representing Ohio’s 2nd House district, has served in Congress since the 2025 term. This profile details the sources of his campaign financing, separating direct contributions from independent expenditures. In the current cycle he received $403,820.89 in direct donations and $3,958.50 in supporting independent expenditures, for a combined support total of $407,779.39. Opposing independent expenditures totaled $1,383.58.

Top Organizational Funders (Current Cycle)

The largest direct donor is the Freshman Agricultural Republican Members Trust (listed under Eric Alan Rick) with a contribution of $6,320.89, reflecting an agricultural interest group. Following it, the National Automobile Dealers Association PAC contributed $5,000, representing the automotive dealer sector. The Mr. Southern Missourian in the House PAC also gave $5,000, a regional political organization. Additional $5,000 contributions came from the Majority Committee PAC, the Automotive Free International Trade PAC, the Political Education Patterns Local 18 of the International Union of Operating Engineers, the Eye of the Tiger PAC, the Council of Insurance Agents & Brokers PAC, the Raptor PAC, the National Association of Realtors PAC, Working for Ohio, and the Electing Majority Making Effective Republicans PAC, each indicating varied sector interests such as political committees, transportation, labor, insurance, real estate, and state-level activism. Among independent expenditures, the National Rifle Association Political Victory Fund spent $1,650.48 in support of Taylor, while the Southern Ohio Conservatives PAC spent $1,383.58 opposing him. The National Right to Life Victory Fund also contributed two supporting expenditures of $1,192.34 and $1,115.68, highlighting pro‑life advocacy support.

Funding Pattern

Pattern observation: Taylor’s top direct donors include agricultural and automotive trade groups, which correspond with his assignments on the House Agriculture Committee and the Transportation and Infrastructure Committee. The Freshman Agricultural Republican Members Trust aligns with his role on the Agriculture Committee, suggesting potential policy interest alignment. Automotive industry donors such as the National Automobile Dealers Association PAC and the Automotive Free International Trade PAC have relevance to the Transportation and Infrastructure Committee’s jurisdiction over road and vehicle legislation. The presence of the Council of Insurance Agents & Brokers PAC and the National Association of Realtors PAC indicates broader financial and real‑estate sector interest, though no direct committee link is evident. Independent expenditures are modest, with a total of $5,342.06, of which the NRA’s support reflects gun‑rights advocacy but does not map to a specific committee assignment. The opposing spend by the Southern Ohio Conservatives PAC suggests intra‑party contestation, yet its impact is limited by the relatively low amount. No recorded votes on tracked bills are available to directly compare voting behavior with donor interests at this time. Overall, the funding profile shows concentration in agriculture, automotive, and conservative advocacy groups, consistent with the policy areas overseen by his committee assignments.

Contribution data sourced from FEC.gov public records. Campaign contributions to registered PACs are legal and regulated; this page reports facts without implying wrongdoing. The "Funding Pattern" section is AI-synthesized analysis, read, edited where needed, and approved by a human editor before publication. Full methodology: Editorial & Methodology.

Recent Voting Record

Source: U.S. House Clerk, Electronic Voting System. Showing most recent recorded votes.

← All Records