TOOMS INTELLIGENCE
SOURCE · FEC.GOV + CONGRESS.GOV PUBLIC RECORDS

James Walkinsaw's Campaign Funding and Committee Role

DEMU.S. HouseVA

By Christopher Smoot, Founder & Editor · Last verified against source: July 28, 2026

Data as of July 28, 2026 · Refresh this data →

Biography and Office

Born 1982.

Congressional service:

Committee Assignments

Why this matters: committee seats are where legislative influence actually happens -- they are frequently the direct explanation for which industries and interest groups direct money toward a given member.

Timeline

Who This Is

James Walkinsaw, a Democrat representing Virginia’s 11th congressional district, has served in the U.S. House since 2025. He sits on the House Committee on Homeland Security and the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. This profile separates his $354,500 in direct organizational contributions from the $2,406,642.90 in supporting independent expenditures, for a combined support total of $2,761,142.90. Opposing independent expenditures total only $2,790, indicating minimal external opposition.

Top Organizational Funders (Current Cycle)

The largest direct contributors each gave $5,000, with the top five being TransDigm Group Inc. Employee PAC (aerospace/defense), NECA PAC (electrical construction), NADA PAC (automotive dealers), the Machinists Non‑Partisan Political League of the International Association of Machinists & Aerospace Workers (labor union), and L3Harris Technologies, Inc. PAC (defense contractor). In the independent‑expenditure arena, Oversight Action Fund spent about $1,065,508 supporting Walkinsaw, while Protect Progress contributed $1,000,000 in support; opposing expenditures were negligible at $2,790. Both categories are presented separately to show direct versus outside spending.

Funding Pattern

Walkinsaw's committee work on Homeland Security aligns with contributions from defense‑related donors such as TransDigm and L3Harris, suggesting a sector connection to his legislative focus. The presence of a labor‑union PAC from the machinist sector also dovetails with homeland‑security procurement and workforce issues. Oversight Action Fund’s substantial support reflects the relevance of his Oversight and Government Reform assignment, indicating outside groups view him as a key player on accountability matters. Protect Progress, a progressive‑leaning super‑PAC, also backs him, reinforcing a broader ideological alignment. The minimal opposing independent‑expenditure amount underscores a lack of organized opposition. No recorded votes on tracked bills are currently available to assess alignment with donor interests. Overall, the funding pattern shows concentrated support from defense, labor, and progressive advocacy groups, consistent with his committee jurisdictions.

Contribution data sourced from FEC.gov public records. Campaign contributions to registered PACs are legal and regulated; this page reports facts without implying wrongdoing. The "Funding Pattern" section is AI-synthesized analysis, read, edited where needed, and approved by a human editor before publication. Full methodology: Editorial & Methodology.

Recent Voting Record

Source: U.S. House Clerk, Electronic Voting System. Showing most recent recorded votes.

← All Records