George Whitesides' Campaign Funding and Committee Role
Data as of August 14, 2026 · Refresh this data →
Biography and Office
Born 1974.
Congressional service:
- 2025–present · House of Representatives, CA-27 (119th Congress)
Committee Assignments
Why this matters: committee seats are where legislative influence actually happens -- they are frequently the direct explanation for which industries and interest groups direct money toward a given member.
- House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology
- House Committee on Armed Services
- ↳ House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology Subcommittee on Space and Aeronautics
- ↳ House Committee on Armed Services Subcommittee on Strategic Forces
- ↳ House Committee on Armed Services Subcommittee on Seapower and Projection Forces
- ↳ House Committee on Armed Services Subcommittee on Cyber, Information Technologies, and Innovation
Timeline
- 2026-07-23 · Voted Yea on Roll Call 282 (Passed)
- 2026-07-23 · Voted Nay on Roll Call 283 (Passed)
- 2026-07-22 · Voted Nay on Roll Call 278 (Passed)
- 2026-07-22 · Voted Yea on Roll Call 279 (Failed)
- 2026-07-22 · Voted Yea on Roll Call 277 (Failed)
- 2026-07-22 · Voted No on Roll Call 275 (Agreed to)
- 2026-07-22 · Voted No on Roll Call 274 (Failed)
- 2026-07-22 · Voted No on Roll Call 273 (Agreed to)
- 2026-07-22 · Voted No on Roll Call 276 (Failed)
- 2026-07-22 · Voted Nay on Roll Call 281 (Passed)
- 2026-07-22 · Voted Nay on Roll Call 280 (Passed)
- 2026-07-21 · Voted No on Roll Call 260 (Agreed to)
- 2026-07-21 · Voted No on Roll Call 259 (Failed)
- 2026-07-21 · Voted Aye on Roll Call 258 (Agreed to)
- 2026-07-21 · Voted Aye on Roll Call 257 (Failed)
Who This Is
George Whitesides, a Democrat representing California’s 27th House district, has served in Congress since 2025. This profile details his direct campaign contributions, independent expenditure activity, and his roles on the House Science, Space, and Technology Committee and the Armed Services Committee. Direct contributions total roughly $3.08 million, while supporting independent expenditures add about $4.06 million, bringing combined support to $7.14 million. Opposing independent expenditures total over $11.3 million.
Top Organizational Funders (Current Cycle)
The largest direct contributors are George Whitesides himself, who gave $500,000, $300,000, $260,000 and $257,621 from his self‑employment income, and an additional $250,000 from his role with Virgin Galactic, a commercial space‑flight company. The Whitesides Victory Fund contributed $130,000 and $99,000, and the Majority Fund added $106,450, reflecting personal and allied political fundraising. In the independent‑expenditure arena, the Congressional Leadership Fund, a Republican super‑PAC, spent more than $7 million in total opposing Whitesides, with individual disbursements of $1.55 million, $1.49 million, $1.47 million, $1.02 million and $1.01 million. The HMP group contributed $583,200 in supporting ads, while the NRCC, another Republican super‑PAC, spent $499,689 opposing the candidate.
Funding Pattern
Pattern observation: Whitesides’ personal financing dominates his direct contribution profile, accounting for over $1.3 million of the $3.08 million total, and includes a sizable donation from Virgin Galactic, aligning with his service on the Science, Space, and Technology Committee that oversees aerospace and commercial space activities. No major defense contractors appear among his top donors, despite his Armed Services Committee assignment, indicating limited direct industry linkage there. Independent‑expenditure activity is heavily skewed opposite, with the Congressional Leadership Fund and NRCC investing more than $8 million to oppose him, while only one pro‑candidate super‑PAC (HMP) contributed a modest $583,200. The absence of any tracked bill votes prevents a direct comparison between his legislative actions and donor interests. Overall, the funding pattern shows a strong personal financing base, a notable aerospace sector contribution, and intense partisan external spending against his campaign.
Contribution data sourced from FEC.gov public records. Campaign contributions to registered PACs are legal and regulated; this page reports facts without implying wrongdoing. The "Funding Pattern" section is AI-synthesized analysis, read, edited where needed, and approved by a human editor before publication. Full methodology: Editorial & Methodology.
Recent Voting Record
- On Motion to Recommit July 22, 2026YeaRoll call 279, Failed →
- On Passage July 22, 2026NayRoll call 278, Passed →
- On Motion to Recommit July 22, 2026YeaRoll call 277, Failed →
- On Agreeing to the Amendment July 22, 2026NoRoll call 276, Failed →
- On Agreeing to the Amendment July 22, 2026NoRoll call 275, Agreed to →
- On Agreeing to the Amendment July 22, 2026NoRoll call 274, Failed →
- On Agreeing to the Amendment July 22, 2026NoRoll call 273, Agreed to →
- On Passage July 21, 2026NayRoll call 272, Passed →
- On Passage July 21, 2026NayRoll call 271, Passed →
- On Motion to Recommit July 21, 2026YeaRoll call 270, Failed →
- On Agreeing to the Amendment July 21, 2026NoRoll call 269, Failed →
- On Agreeing to the Amendment July 21, 2026NoRoll call 268, Agreed to →
- On Agreeing to the Amendment July 21, 2026NoRoll call 267, Agreed to →
- On Agreeing to the Amendment July 21, 2026NoRoll call 266, Failed →
- On Agreeing to the Amendment July 21, 2026NoRoll call 265, Agreed to →
Source: U.S. House Clerk, Electronic Voting System. Showing most recent recorded votes.
← All Records